Skip to main content

Podcast episode 179: Why do places look the way they do?


Episode 179 of the podcast is available now via this link or from the usual podcast platforms.

Friend of the podcast Andrew Taylor and I were at a symposium organised by Create Streets at Hatfield House in June last year called ‘Building for generations’. It was an interesting day and all the of presentations and the conversations there upon led me back to the fundamental question as to why places look the way they do. That, it seemed to me on the train back that evening, would make for a good episode of a town planning-based podcast because of, course, sometimes lost perhaps amongst the noisier topics of conversation like housing numbers or Green Belt or strategic planning, is that a fundamental function of town and country planning is to improve existing places and create high-quality new ones.

So, I sought to convene some experts in the field of design and placemaking to answer that question.

Those experts are old friends of the podcast Hana Loftus (who steers the conversation), the afore-mentioned Andrew Taylor and Katie Wray. They are joined by new friends of the podcast Eleanor Fawcett and Peter Maxwell.

Hana is a Director at HAT Projects; Andrew is Group Planning and Sustainability Director at Vistry; Katie is a Director at Deloitte; Eleanor is the Built Environment Fellow for the 1851 Royal Commission; and Peter is an Assistant Director at the Cambridge Growth Company.

In a conversation recorded online back in January of this year they talk about what it is that makes the places that we like (what makes them ‘sticky’, asks Katie); they talk about culture, are places the way they are because ultimately that is the way we want them to be; they talk about the role of planning, does it make places better or worse; they talk about highways adoption standards, obviously, and they finish by talking about the changes that they would want to see to help deliver better places.

If you enjoy the episode do please consider bolstering my fragile self-esteem by leaving the podcast a nice rating and a nice review wherever you listen to it. Obviously though if you have not enjoyed it then please do not leave a review, but do please feel free to let me know why. Feedback on 50 Shades episodes is always welcome.

If you have enjoyed to the extent that you feel compelled to share the podcast on one your social platforms then, if you tag me, you will be entitled to an exclusive and much-sought after 50 Shades of Planning mug.

50 Shades of Planning is the podcast by planners and for planners and so if you would like to use it as a platform for sharing anything you think that the sector needs to be talking about then you are also very welcome to get in touch with Sam via samstafford@hotmail.com or the 50 Shades WhatsApp Community.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m...

50 Shades of Planning T-Shirts!

If you have listened to Episode 45 of the 50 Shades of Planning Podcast you will have heard Clive Betts say that... 'In the Netherlands planning is seen as part of the solution. In the UK, too often, planning is seen as part of the problem'. I said in reply that that would look good on a t-shirt so I have made a few and it does! They are available in black or white (in S, M and L sizes) and are £15 if there is a chance that I'll be able to deliver one to you or £20 if you will need it posting. Please email samstafford@hotmail.com if you would like one. Planning might not be black and white, but the 50 Shades t-shirts are...

YIMBYs and NIMBYs. Is planning becoming a new front in the culture war?

Prepare the barricades, fellow planners; dig out a shelter at the bottom of your garden (if you are lucky enough to have a garden…); and stock up on tins of non-perishable food. There might be a culture war coming and a good planner always spots trouble before it arrives... Given broader cultural, media and political trends it was perhaps only a matter of time before the built environment was subject to the same us versus them, progressive versus regressive factionalism that mars other aspects of public policy and debate. Twitter, of course, is not representative of public opinion, but it can be representative of the cultural, media and political influencers that are shaping it and I spotted this image on there recently. As far as I could tell it was a Brit that posted it and so it is not one of those unseemly intellectual skirmishes breezily dismissed as something our crazy, madcap cousins on the other side of the Atlantic occupy themselves with. Stereotypes are sometimes funny and so...