If you were to talk about the three main things around AI and planning what would they be? This was a question posed in a WhatsApp group to which I am party and it prompted a thread that was so good that I asked the contributors if I could capture it. The consensus on those three main things was as following. Data AI is only as good as the data it uses, and the consensus seems to be that not only are we starting from a low baseline, digital maturity within LPAs is low as well. Plan-making, at all levels, offers the opportunity for a reset, but will that opportunity be taken? Efficiencies Within the plan-making process itself there might be, for example, opportunities in relation to identifying sites and their capacity. The greater opportunities to free up officer time within LPAs could though be using AI for PD and householder applications, many of which are more algorithmic. Objections & Engagement Any discussion about AI and planning either starts with or ends with the risks of A...
Episode 169 of 50 Shades of Planning is available now via this link or from the usual podcast platforms. The role of local councillors in the planning system has been a familiar topic of conversation on the podcast in the context of, for example, overturning officer recommendations and the case for a national scheme of delegation. There is less talk about the role of MPs in the planning system, which is something that friend of the podcast Andrew Taylor wanted to remedy. This then is the first of what he and I hope will be five episodes exploring the role of a member of a parliament by way of conversations that Andrew records with representatives from the now five major parties. First, Labour, and a conversation recorded with Elsie Blundell and Mike Reader back in March. Andrew, regular listeners will know, is Group Planning and Sustainability Director at Vistry, Elsie represents Heywood and Middleton North and Mike represents Northampton South. Andrew explores with Elsie and Mike...