Episode 173 of the podcast is available now via this link or from the usual podcast platforms. This is the fourth of a series of episodes being led by the oldest friend of the podcast, Paul Smith . Paul, regular listeners will know, is the Managing Director at the Strategic Land Group and a Housing Today columnist. Paul put it to me a little while ago that debates about the planning system in England tend, for the most part, to focus solely on the planning system in England. We very seldom look to other countries for inspiration and ideas. Paul wanted to remedy that and so in this series he is chatting with planning professionals and academics from a number of countries to find out what works well there, what works less well, and what can we learn. In this episode Paul explores the planning system in New Zealand with Stuart Donovan . Stuart is an economist and Senior Fellow with Motu Research, an independent Wellington-based economics and public policy institute. In a conversation rec...
You might have seen that friend of the 50 Shades of Planning podcast Catriona Riddell's latest column for Planning was called 'How planning could work in 2036 (if the new system is allowed to bed down)'. "High speed railways, electricity lines and reservoirs, plus a network of new towns offering plentiful affordable housing, will be enabled in the next decade by the reformed planning system, says our columnist." "2036 is looking bright, thanks to the decisions made in 2026!" was Catriona's final line. What if those decisions are not made though? An alternative take on what we might be dealing with in ten years time was shared by a mutual friend of Catriona and I in a WhatsApp group to which we are both part and the author of that alternative take was agreeable to me sharing it anonymously on here. In 2036 it has been accepted that the plan-led system was a myth. The 30-month plan-making system was a disaster due to pesky things like needing to achie...