The 50 Shades of Planning Blog

If you are involved they are terrible, but if you are just observing they are terrific. That is how, way back in the day..., I introduced Episode 7 of 50 Shades of Planning. If you are reading a town planning-based blog then the chances are that you will have participated in a planning committee previously, will know immediately what I mean, and will have your own tales to tell. If you are not a planner though or have not been subject to this unique ‘cauldron of human emotion’ (which is what I called Episode 7) then you should watch Wokingham ’s planning committee take over an hour to debate the merits of a proposed communications kiosk in Woodley recently (I only knew about this because I saw somebody last week who had to sit through this discussion whilst waiting for the next application, but you could probably pick any planning committee at any council on any day of the year and see something similar). Yes, of course, not all planning committees are akin to putting the fate of a tr...

Episode 161 of 50 Shades of Planning is available now via this link or from Apple and Spotify . I was in Manchester recently and took the opportunity to catch up with friends of the podcast Lisa Tye, Andrew Johnston and Louise Fountain to discuss some of the issues of the day. In a conversation recorded at Reform Radio we talked about the imminent changes to appeal guidance; we talked about the design and placemaking PPG; we talked about affordable housing delivery and the misalignment between Home England’s grant funding and Section 106 requirements; we went back to design and placemaking to talk about Design Review; and towards the end we talked about LPAs charging for invalid applications. The general theme of the discussion though, and hence the title of this episode, was set by a phrase that Lisa used at the start of the discussion and which seems to capture the mood of the moment, certainly as far as the development industry is concerned.

Episode 160 of 50 Shades of Planning is available now via this link or Apple and Spotify . Strategic planning, as I said in the introduction to episode 157, is back and that episode, you might recall, looked at what shape it is in right now. What have authorities been able to do whilst awaiting the consolidation of the Planning & Infrastructure Act, the NPPF and the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill? What we did know just a few weeks ago, but we do now, are the new strategic geographies outside of areas governed by a mayor and where some work on Spatial Development Strategies is already underway. So the podcast has looked at where we are now, but what do those tasked with consolidating the Planning & Infrastructure Act, the NPPF and the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, and those producing SDSs, need to know about the last time we were planning strategically given that some time has now passed since the revocation of the Regional Spatial Strat...

Episode 159 of 50 Shades of Planning is available now via this link or Apple and Spotify . My initial aim for the 50 Shades of Planning podcast was to replicate James Richardson’s Totally Football show in which he chats to a revolving cast of regular contributors about the issues of the day. Over time these episodes have become interspersed with other more thematic episodes, but I have done that from the outset with some friends in Manchester and then later, as I started spending more time down there, with some friends in The Big Smoke. I mention that because I was in Birmingham last week and recorded the first of this type of ‘catch up’ episode with some of my friends working in the West Midlands. Kathryn Ventham, old friend of the podcast, is a Senior Director at Twenty5 Planning; Myles Wild-Smith, new friend of the podcast, is a Director at Lichfields; and Michelle Simpson-Gallego, also a new friend of the podcast, is a Senior Planning Manager at Terra Strategic. In a conversation...

Episode 158 of 50 Shades of Planning is available now via this link or Apple and Spotify . Sometimes episode ideas are put to me, sometimes they come to me in the middle of the night, and sometimes I’ll read something and think to myself, ‘Hmm, that’s interesting…’ Back in October last year I came across a blog by Jack Airey, who is now a Director at Public First but was the Head of Planning at Policy Exchange and subsequently spent a few years inside Number 10 as a Special Advisor to the Prime Minister. The opening line of Jack’s blog was ‘How does bad policy get made?’ and he writes about “the war of attrition that is Whitehall policymaking”; backbench pressure; and the “lack of institutional understanding” within government about how the practical impact of policy proposals. I asked Jack if he would be up for talking about these themes on the pod and, pleasingly, he was, so I thought next about who else it would be interesting to hear from about life inside the Westminster policy-...

Episode 157 of 50 Shades of Planning is available now via this link (or from Apple and Spotify ). Strategic planning is back. What do we know? We know that Policy PM1 of the revised draft NPPF anticipates the move towards national coverage of spatial development strategies, as promised by the end of the parliamentary term, and clarifies their role, content, and relationship to other tiers of the development plan. SDSs are intended to be high-level documents focused on genuinely strategic, cross-boundary issues, leaving detailed policy to other plans. We know that the Planning and Infrastructure Act, the second SDS building block, gained royal assent last month and sets out the process by which authorities, be they Mayoral authorities, combined authorities or combined county authorities should prepare SDSs. We know that the third SDS building block, the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (which has reached the committee stage in the House of Lords), will confirm the str...