Skip to main content

The 50 Shades of Planning podcast

If you listened to the 50 Shades of Planning podcast and would be interested in it's possible return, please do read on. If you did not and are not, please feel free to move on.

A few months ago a material change in circumstances meant that I drew the podcast to a close, but, pleasingly, another material change in circumstances means that I can think about starting it back up again.

First things first though. I will need to solicit financial support in order for the pod to operate in the same way that it has done. If then you have control over a marketing budget, or know somebody that does, please let me know.

Second things second. In the hope that support is forthcoming from somewhere, I will be thinking about how a refreshed and reinvigorated pod can come back bigger and better than ever. To that end I would welcome any feedback from anybody that has ever listened to it in the past. What did you like? What did you not like? Should fewer topics be covered in more detail or more topics in fewer detail? Do you have any ideas for topics that have not been covered? Who would you like to hear more from? Who would you like to hear less from? Would you like to be involved in putting episodes together yourself, either passively by contributing ideas or by getting actively involved in recording?

I used to say (and will keep saying) that 50 Shades of Planning is 'the podcast by planners and for planners' and so as well as soliciting opinion on the pod to date I wanted to reassert the open invitation to anybody interested in being involved.

Please de feel free to get in touch with me via samstafford@hotmail.com.



Comments

  1. I listened to several episodes over the last few years, probably about 1 in 2 of the ones that came out in the period I was listening, since about 2022.

    I found the episodes I listened to interesting although there were some things that I felt could have improved the podcast. One of these was that a number of episodes followed the form of an introduction during which various names of speakers were listed, following by a group discussion featuring three or four individuals - on a number of occasions I found it difficult to tell who the person talking at any one point actually was. I wonder if either having fewer people talking, or breaking the podcast up so it was simpler to follow who the speaker was and what their role/job/professional interest in the topic was, would make the podcast more accessible to those not already familiar with the individuals or organisations involved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looking for reliable powder coating guns in West Midlands? Get top-quality equipment, superior finish results, and affordable pricing. Enquire today!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m...

50 Shades of Planning T-Shirts!

If you have listened to Episode 45 of the 50 Shades of Planning Podcast you will have heard Clive Betts say that... 'In the Netherlands planning is seen as part of the solution. In the UK, too often, planning is seen as part of the problem'. I said in reply that that would look good on a t-shirt so I have made a few and it does! They are available in black or white (in S, M and L sizes) and are £15 if there is a chance that I'll be able to deliver one to you or £20 if you will need it posting. Please email samstafford@hotmail.com if you would like one. Planning might not be black and white, but the 50 Shades t-shirts are...

YIMBYs and NIMBYs. Is planning becoming a new front in the culture war?

Prepare the barricades, fellow planners; dig out a shelter at the bottom of your garden (if you are lucky enough to have a garden…); and stock up on tins of non-perishable food. There might be a culture war coming and a good planner always spots trouble before it arrives... Given broader cultural, media and political trends it was perhaps only a matter of time before the built environment was subject to the same us versus them, progressive versus regressive factionalism that mars other aspects of public policy and debate. Twitter, of course, is not representative of public opinion, but it can be representative of the cultural, media and political influencers that are shaping it and I spotted this image on there recently. As far as I could tell it was a Brit that posted it and so it is not one of those unseemly intellectual skirmishes breezily dismissed as something our crazy, madcap cousins on the other side of the Atlantic occupy themselves with. Stereotypes are sometimes funny and so...