Skip to main content

Podcast episode 135: A Brief History of Planning 2010-2024

Episode 135, which is the final episode of 50 Shades of Planning, is available now via this link or from iTunes and Spotify.

Back in March this year friend of the podcast Catriona Riddell gave a lecture at UCL’s Bartlett School of Planning that she called ‘Strategic Planning in England - Where did we go so wrong?’. I could not be there, but Catriona shared her slides on LinkedIn and they read to me almost like a ‘Brief History of Planning 2010-2024’, which I thought a good subject for an episode. Attention was being turned around that time to where a new Government, most likely then a new Labour Government, might take the planning system, so a good time to take stock of and try to learn the lessons of what is now the last Government.

As well as Catriona, who was Director of Planning at the South East England Regional Assembly when the Coalition Government came to power in 2010, I approached another friend of podcast, Steve Quartermain, Chief Planner between 2008 and 2020, who was also keen to be involved. I felt though that we needed a political perspective on things so I also approached Greg Clark.

Greg was appointed Director of Policy for the Conservative Party in 2001 before being elected as MP for Royal Tunbridge Wells in 2005. Greg has held a number of senior Government roles, including, and of most relevance to us, Minister for Decentralisation and Cities within the Department for Communities and Local Government between May 2010 and September 2012 and Secretary of State for CLG between May 2015 and July 2016, and also briefly Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities between July 2022 and September 2022.

Greg, very pleasingly, was also keen to be involved, and the four of us finally got together at Soho Radio Studios in early October.

There were many, many topics of possible conversation in my notes for the recording. We did not actually get to the latter part of that 2010-2024 period, so we did not get to, for example, the Standard Method, the 2020 White Paper, and the whole Theresa Villiers / LURB amendments brouhaha, but that was because we ended up dwelling on, arguably, the big three topics of that 2010-2024 period, which are the revocation of the Regional Strategies, Localism and the NPPF. We did also touch, right at the end of the episode, on permitted development rights.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m...

The Green Belt. What it is and why; what it isn't; and what it should be

‘I began to see what a sacred cow the Green Belt has become’. Richard Crossman, Minister for Housing & Local Government, in 1964. The need for change The mere mention of the words Green Belt raise hackles. There are some who consider it’s present boundaries to be sacrosanct. According to recent Ipsos polling, six in ten people in England would retain it's current extent of Green Belt even if it restricts the country's ability to meet housing needs. There are some, including leader writers at The Economist , who would do away with it all together. Neither position is tenable, but there is a trend towards an entrenchment of these positions that makes sensible conversations about meeting housing needs almost impossible. The status quo is unsustainable, both literally and figuratively. The past In both planning and cultural terms, the notion of a ‘Green Belt’ goes back a long way. Long after Thomas More’s ‘ Utopia ’ and Elizabeth I’s ‘ Cordon Sanitaire ’ in 1580, the roots of ...

Labour's planning proposals

There is a sense among some that Labour is 'keeping it's powder dry' on housing and planning so as 'not to scare the horses', but actually, when you compile everything that has been put into the public domain, the future direction of policy is relatively easy to discern. This is that compilation, which takes in a couple of press releases (and, importantly, the 'notes to editors'), a policy paper, an extract from a Westminster Hall debate, and Sunday Times and FT articles. ‘How’, not ‘if’: Labour will jump start planning to build 1.5 million homes and save the dream of homeownership Oct 10, 2023 https://labour.org.uk/updates/press-releases/how-not-if-labour-will-jump-start-planning-to-build-1-5-million-homes-and-save-the-dream-of-homeownership/ Labour’s Housing Recovery Plan Upon entering office, the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Angela Rayner, will publish a Written Ministerial Statement and write to...