Skip to main content

Financial incentives for locals to lead garden cities

When the Government published it's garden city prospectus in April it expressed a belief, somewhat optimistically, that "in many areas, people want to be ambitious and innovative in their approach to delivering the homes they need."

The prospectus is consistent with the message that emanated from ministers prior to it's publication, which was that new towns would not be imposed on any part of the country, so at paragraph 5, for example, it states that "we would like to work with local authorities who want to create locally-led Garden Cities".

Well Eland House has clearly not been inundated with requests from local authority chief executives  because Nick Clegg has sought to pique interest by suggesting that the government could 'buy homes blighted by developments or offer owners council tax cuts while building takes place'.

Tellingly, Mr Clegg states that "we are actively looking at things to show that we will go the extra mile to allay those concerns of people who feel that their property or the price of their home might be affected." These are no doubt the same people who the British Social Attitudes survey reveals accept the need for new homes to be built, but just not near them (which is most of the country...).
  

Housing Minister Brandon Lewis has described Mr Clegg's suggestions as an "interesting contribution" to the debate. They are interesting in that they highlight the path between growth-promotion and house price-preservation that the political parties will be navigating between now and the election, but I would predict with some confidence that they will not prompt a local authority chief executive to dust off an eco-town prospectus and pick up the phone to Mr Pickles. 

In anticipation of the prospectus earlier this year I wrote in this post that if it only goes as far as to say that 'garden cities are a good idea and local authorities should work with communities to explore their creation' then the next garden city or two is probably still another generation away. That Mr Clegg has had to move the debate towards financial incentives illustrates this point. If Garden Cities are going to be built they will need to be Government-led not locally-led, but we will need to get the general election out of the way for a political to even contemplate saying so. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Planning Reform Week

The first bit On the day that I started writing this the Prime Minister has confirmed in a move considered intellectually incoherent by some that hundreds of new oil and gas licenses will be granted in the UK, which signals that it is ‘Energy Week’ on the Government’s summer recess comms grid. A line appears to have been drawn from the role of an Ultra Low Emission Zone policy in securing a marginal win for the Conservatives in the Uxbridge & South Ruislip by-election to the softening of commitments to a net zero energy strategy. Seven days ago the Prime Minister launched the grid’s ‘Planning Reform Week’ by announcing that the Government will meet its manifesto commitment to build 1 million homes over this parliament, which would represent “another important milestone in the government’s already successful housebuilding strategy”. It is notable given the ground that Labour has gained on housing in recent months that the first week of the parliamentary recess was devoted to tryin
1 comment
Read more

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m
42 comments
Read more

The Green Belt. What it is and why; what it isn't; and what it should be.

‘I began to see what a sacred cow the Green Belt has become’. Richard Crossman, Minister for Housing & Local Government, in 1964. The need for change The mere mention of the words Green Belt raise hackles. There are some who consider it’s present boundaries to be sacrosanct. According to recent Ipsos polling, six in ten people in England would retain it's current extent of Green Belt even if it restricts the country's ability to meet housing needs. There are some, including leader writers at The Economist , who would do away with it all together. Neither position is tenable, but there is a trend towards an entrenchment of these positions that makes sensible conversations about meeting housing needs almost impossible. The status quo is unsustainable, both literally and figuratively. The past In both planning and cultural terms, the notion of a ‘Green Belt’ goes back a long way. Long after Thomas More’s ‘ Utopia ’ and Elizabeth I’s ‘ Cordon Sanitaire ’ in 1580, the roots of
Post a Comment
Read more