Skip to main content

Designing a joined-up government

In a fantastic example of joined-up, cross-department government thinking, the Farrell Review, an independent review of architecture and the built environment, will report today, barely three weeks after the publication of national planning policy guidance (NPPG).

Sir Terry Farrell was commissioned by Culture and Creative Industries Minister Ed Vaizey in March 2013 with the intention of 'helping the Department for Culture, Media and Sport develop its thinking about the role for Government in the achievement of high quality design to better influence and shape policy across government'.

In terms of influencing planning policy though that horse has probably bolted. The NPPG, in the spirit of the NPPF consolidates the 100 pages of guidance in 'By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System' (2000) and 'Better Places to Live By Design' (2001) with 18 pages, emphasises what good design is and why it is important, but provides little by way of practical examples of how good design can be embedded in the planning system.

Whilst the consolidation of guidance was largely welcomed by practitioners, it is telling that RIBA's Head of External Affairs Anna Scott-Marshall described the housing design section as 'inadequate'.

If the Telegraph's reporting of the Farrell Review is accurate then it's conclusions sound laudable.
  • Nominate 'civic champions' within LPAs to 'improve design quality';
  • architecture and design on the national curriculum in schools;
  • basic design training for councillors who vote on planning decisions; 
  • more 'design literate' planners;
  • making the process of listing buildings more democratic and transparent; and
  • cutting VAT on renovation and repair of private homes to 5%.
The first thought that came to my mind though when hearing of the review's launch this morning though was that this is the same government that in 2010 withdrew funding from CABE.

CABE was the direct successor body to the Royal Fine Art Commission and was established in August 1999 following Richard Roger's Urban Task Force in 1998. Some of CABE's functions, including design review and localism and planning, were merged with the Design Council in 2011, but it's worth noting that the Design Council charge £4,000 for a preliminary design workshop and £3,500 for planning application review. 

At a TCPA conference in 2012 Planning Minster Nick Boles "struck out once again at the poor design of housing estates arguing that the key to overcoming opposition to development is to make it more ‘beautiful’."

The Farrell Review might help contribute towards that aim, but it's timing doesn't speak of a government committed to the cause. It does though support another of the Farrell recommendations, which is a chief architect reporting to both DCMS and DCLG to 'connect government departments and ensure a consistency of approach'...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Life on the Front Line

I like it when people get in touch with me to suggest topics for 50 Shades of Planning Podcast episodes because, firstly, it means that people are listening to it and also, and most importantly, it means I do not have to come up with ideas myself. I found this message from a team leader at a local authority striking and sobering though. In a subsequent conversation the person that sent this confided in me that their team is virtually in crisis mode. It is probably fair to say that the planning system is in crisis, but then it is also probably fair to say that the planning system is always in crisis… There is, of course, the issue of resources. Whilst according to a Planning magazine survey slightly more LPAs are predicting growth in planning department budgets (25%) rather than a contraction (22%), this has to be seen in the context of a 38% real-terms fall in net current expenditure on planning functions between 2010–11 and 2017–18. Beyond resources though the current crisis feels m...
59 comments
Read more

The Green Belt. What it is and why; what it isn't; and what it should be

‘I began to see what a sacred cow the Green Belt has become’. Richard Crossman, Minister for Housing & Local Government, in 1964. The need for change The mere mention of the words Green Belt raise hackles. There are some who consider it’s present boundaries to be sacrosanct. According to recent Ipsos polling, six in ten people in England would retain it's current extent of Green Belt even if it restricts the country's ability to meet housing needs. There are some, including leader writers at The Economist , who would do away with it all together. Neither position is tenable, but there is a trend towards an entrenchment of these positions that makes sensible conversations about meeting housing needs almost impossible. The status quo is unsustainable, both literally and figuratively. The past In both planning and cultural terms, the notion of a ‘Green Belt’ goes back a long way. Long after Thomas More’s ‘ Utopia ’ and Elizabeth I’s ‘ Cordon Sanitaire ’ in 1580, the roots of ...
11 comments
Read more

Labour's planning proposals

There is a sense among some that Labour is 'keeping it's powder dry' on housing and planning so as 'not to scare the horses', but actually, when you compile everything that has been put into the public domain, the future direction of policy is relatively easy to discern. This is that compilation, which takes in a couple of press releases (and, importantly, the 'notes to editors'), a policy paper, an extract from a Westminster Hall debate, and Sunday Times and FT articles. ‘How’, not ‘if’: Labour will jump start planning to build 1.5 million homes and save the dream of homeownership Oct 10, 2023 https://labour.org.uk/updates/press-releases/how-not-if-labour-will-jump-start-planning-to-build-1-5-million-homes-and-save-the-dream-of-homeownership/ Labour’s Housing Recovery Plan Upon entering office, the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Angela Rayner, will publish a Written Ministerial Statement and write to...
4 comments
Read more